telecommunications16 channel dvr corporations

"Loss of confidence in our ability to adhere to confidentiality agreements would lead to loss of access to proprietary network camera  information that can save time when developing new capability," intelligence workers were told. Somewhat less important to GCHQ was the public's trust which was marked as a moderate risk, the document stated.

"Some exploitable products are used by the general public; some exploitable weaknesses are well known eg possibility of recovering poorly chosen passwords," it said. "Knowledge that GCHQ exploits these products and the scale of our capability would raise public awareness generating unwelcome publicity for us and our political masters."

The decryption effort is particularly important to GCHQ. Its strategic advantage from its Tempora program – direct taps on transatlantic fibre-optic cables of major telecommunications16 channel dvr corporations – was in danger of eroding as more and more big internet companies encrypted their traffic, responding to customer demands for guaranteed privacy.

Without attention, the 2010 GCHQ document warned, the UK's "Sigint utility will degrade as information flows changes, new applications are developed (and deployed) at pace and widespread encryption becomes more commonplace." Documents show that Edgehill's initial aim was to decode the encrypted traffic certified by three major (unnamed) internet companies and 30 types of Virtual Private Network (VPN) – used by businesses to provide secure remote access to their systems. By 2015, GCHQ hoped to have cracked the codes used by 15 major internet companies, and 300 VPNs.

Another program, codenamed Cheesy Name, was aimed at singling out encryption keys, known as 'certificates', that might be vulnerable to being cracked by GCHQ supercomputers.

Analysts on the Edgehill project were working on ways into the networks of major webmail providers as part of the decryption project. A quarterly update from 2012 notes the project's team "continue to work on understanding" the big four communication providers, named 8 channel dvr in the document as Hotmail, Google, Yahoo and Facebook, adding "work has predominantly been focused this quarter on Google due to new access opportunities being developed".

crypto 16 channel nvr systems

It is used by the NSA to "to leverage sensitive, co-operative relationships with specific industry partners" to insert nvr sytem vulnerabilities into security products. Operatives were warned that this information must be kept top secret "at a minimum".

A more general NSA classification guide reveals more detail on the agency's deep partnerships with industry, and its ability to modify products. It cautions analysts that two facts must remain top secret: that NSA makes modifications to commercial encryption software and devices "to make them exploitable", and that NSA "obtains cryptographic details of commercial cryptographic information security systems through industry relationships".

The agencies have not yet cracked all encryption technologies, however, the documents suggest. Snowden appeared to confirm this during a live Q&A with Guardian readers in June. "Encryption works. Properly implemented strong crypto 16 channel nvr systems are one of the few things that you can rely on," he said before warning that NSA can frequently find ways around it as a result of weak security on the computers at either end of the communication.

The documents are scattered with warnings over the importance of maintaining absolute secrecy around decryption capabilities.

A slide showing that the secrecy of the agencies' capabilities against encryption is closely guarded. Photograph: Guardian
Strict guidelines were laid down at the GCHQ complex in Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, on how to discuss projects relating to decryption. Analysts were instructed: "Do not ask about or speculate on sources or methods underpinning Bullrun." This informaton was so closely guarded, according to one document, that even those with access to aspects of the program were warned: "There will be no 'need to know'."

The agencies were supposed to be "selective in which contractors are given exposure to this information", but it was ultimately seen by Snowden, one of 850,000 people in the US with top-secret clearance.A 2009 GCHQ document spells 4 channel nvr out the significant potential consequences of any leaks, including "damage to industry relationships".

legally security systems compelled

Technology companies maintain that they work with the intelligence agencies only when legally security systems compelled to do so. The Guardian has previously reported that Microsoft co-operated with the NSA to circumvent encryption on the Outlook.com email and chat services. The company insisted that it was obliged to comply with "existing or future lawful demands" when designing its products.

The documents show that the agency has already achieved another of the goals laid out in the budget request: to influence the international standards upon which encryption systems rely.

Independent security experts have long suspected that the NSA has been introducing weaknesses into security standards, a fact confirmed for the first time by another secret document. It shows the agency worked covertly to get its own version of a draft security standard issued by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology approved for worldwide use in 2006.

"Eventually, NSA became the sole editor," the document states.

The NSA's codeword for its decryption program, Bullrun, is taken from a major battle of the American civil war. Its British counterpart, Edgehill, is named after the first major engagement of the English civil war, more than 200 years earlier.

A classification guide for NSA employees and contractors on Bullrun outlines in broad terms its goals.

"Project Bullrun deals with NSA's abilities to defeat the encryption used in specific network communication technologies. Bullrun involves multiple sources, all of which are extremely sensitive." The document reveals that the agency has capabilities against widely surveillance system used online protocols, such as HTTPS, voice-over-IP and Secure Sockets Layer (SSL), used to protect online shopping and banking.

The document also shows that the NSA's Commercial Solutions Center, ostensibly the body through which technology companies can have their security products assessed and presented to prospective government buyers, has another, more clandestine role.

worldwide surveillance camera marketplace

The NSA spends $250m a year on a program which, among other goals, works with technology ip camera companies to “covertly influence” their product designs.

• The secrecy of their capabilities against encryption is closely guarded, with analysts warned: “Do not ask about or speculate on sources or methods.”

• The NSA describes strong decryption programs as the “price of admission for the US to maintain unrestricted access to and use of cyberspace”.

• A GCHQ team has been working to develop ways into encrypted traffic on the “big four” service providers, named as Hotmail, Google, Yahoo and Facebook.$254.9m for this year – dwarfs that of the Prism program, which operates at a cost of $20m a year, according to previous NSA documents. Since 2011, the total spending on Sigint enabling has topped $800m. The program “actively engages US and foreign IT industries to covertly influence and/or overtly leverage their commercial products’ designs”, the document states. None of the companies involved in such partnerships are named; these details are guarded by still higher levels of classification.

Among other things, the program is designed to “insert vulnerabilities into commercial encryption systems”. These would be known to the NSA, but to no one else, including ordinary customers, who are tellingly referred to in the document as “adversaries”.

"These design changes make the systems in question exploitable through Sigint collection … with foreknowledge of the modification. To the consumer and other adversaries, however, the systems’ security remains intact."

The document sets out in clear terms the program’s broad aims, including making commercial encryption software “more tractable” to NSA attacks by “shaping” the worldwide surveillance camera marketplace and continuing efforts to break into the encryption used by the next generation of 4G phones.

Among the specific accomplishments for 2013, the NSA expects the program to obtain access to “data flowing through a hub for a major communications provider” and to a “major internet peer-to-peer voice and text communications system”.

litigation 16 channel dvr underfoot

providing an opportunity for a hearing to challenge security systems fairness of the predictive process; and
the establishment of an impartial adjudicator and judicial review to ensure accountability of those who adjudicate others, i.e. those who deprive individuals of a liberty interest do so without unwarranted bias or a direct financial interest in the outcome.
The use of big data is intrinsically linked to ethical values, which means that the starting point must be the development international guidelines governing access to and analysis of individuals’ data. Thus as Crawford and Schultz conclude:The latest Snowden document revelation, which shows how GCHQ and the NSA are conducting broad, real-time monitoring of YouTube, Facebook, and Blogger using a program called "Squeaky Dolphin," is the most recent demonstration of the immense interception capabilities of intelligence services.

Despite the program's cute name, "Squeaky Dolphin" is shocking in its ability to intercept raw data, which includes sensitive personal and location information, and keep tabs on people across the world who are simply uploading videos or 'liking' the links on their friends' Facebook walls. Such massive, unrestrained capabilities are no way consistent with international law, as their capabilities and execution are clearly neither necessary nor proportionate. Because of this, Privacy International has litigation 16 channel dvr underfoot to challenge the legality of GCHQ's surveillance activities on the grounds that they fly in the face of the UK's human rights obligations. Operations like Squeaky Dolphin are yet another manifestation of GCHQ's disregard for privacy rights, and starkly illustrate the problem of secret, unaccountable intelligence gathering.

Frighteningly, the capabilities demonstrated by Squeaky Dolphin - the combination of tapping IP networks and the construction of that with sources such as Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, and other services - are not the exclusive preserve of the NSA and GCHQ. Privacy International's Surveillance Industry Index shows that surveillance companies are marketing and selling these services right off the shelf, giving willing governments anywhere the ability to intercept huge amounts of raw data, monitor 8 channel dvr social networks in real time, and analyse the information obtained to create profiles on specific individuals and targets.

data surveillance camera collected

Data is data. Yet the short- and long-term consequences of collecting data in environments where appropriate legal and institutional safeguards are lacking have not been properly explored. Amassing ip camera and analysing data always has the potential to enable surveillance, regardless of the well-intentioned objectives that may underpin its collection. Development is not merely about economic prosperity, and social services. It is about providing individuals with a safe environment in which they can live in dignity.

Towards accountability

In their recently published paper, Big data and Due Process: Towards A Framework to Redress Predictive Privacy Harms, Crawford and Schultz propose a new framework for a “right to procedural data due process,” arguing that “individuals who are privately and often secretly 'judged' by big data should have similar rights to those judged by the courts with respect to how their personal data has been used in such adjudications”.

Unlike the common model of personally identifiable information, big data does not easily fall within legally protected categories of data. This means there are no legal provisions protecting the data surveillance camera collected, processed and disclosed, and the rights of individuals whose data is being analysed.

Therefore, Crawford and Schultz have innovatively re-visited some relevant founding principles of the legal concept of due process. Due process (as understood in the American context) prohibits the government from depriving an individual’s rights to life, liberty, or property without affording them access to certain basic procedural components of the adjudication process. The concept equally exists under European human rights law, though is more commonly called procedural fairness.

By doing so, Crawford and Schultz are challenging the fairness of the process of collection rather than the attempting to regulate it, which would be more complex and contested. They have thus applied these principles to address existing privacy concerns linked to the development and use of big data, namely:

requiring those who use big data to “adjudicate” others, to post some form of notice disclosing not only the type of predictions they are attempting, but also the general sources of data that they are drawing surveillance system upon as inputs, including a means whereby those whose personal data in included can learn of that fact;

wireless ip camera Security Hazard Monitoring System

While being billed as a way to monitor social media in order to “monitor
security hazards in social networks” and “identify persons representing a
danger on society” (sic), past and recent actions by the Egyptian government
demonstrate that democracy activists, political dissidents, and journalists are
likely to be targeted. Just this week, prominent democracy ip camera activist and writer
Alaa Abd El Fattah was sentenced to 15 years on trumped up charges for
“illegal protesting and attacking a police officer.” Fattah, who has been
jailed repeatedly for his activism, was arrested outside a Cairo courtroom
after being prevented from attending his own trial and sentenced in absentia.

Given the crackdown that has occurred under ex-army chief and now President
Abdul Fattah al-Sisi, it is frightening that the government will possess a
surveillance system with the ability to monitor individuals, groups and
organisations on social media around the clock. While the White House has asked
Sisi to carry out human rights reforms, U.S. and European governments must also
cease the export of the Western-built tools that enable human right violations
in Egypt.

The Social Networks wireless ip camera Security Hazard Monitoring System

The copy of a call for tenders, leaked to the government-tied media outlet El
Watan, asked for surveillance companies to submit plans for building an open
source intelligence system called the “Social Networks Security Hazard
Monitoring system”. The purpose of this system is to “conduct wide searches
on various networks to find everything that is a violation of the law, the
spreading of destructive ideas that help spreading chaos, tensions and
corruption in society.”

In the document, the Ministry of Interior lays out what these “destructive
ideas” are:

…blasphemy and skepticism in religions; regional, religious, racial, and class
divisions; spreading of rumors and intentional twisting of facts; throwing
accusations; libel; sarcasm; using inappropriate words; calling for the
departure of societal pillars;4ch NVR System encouraging extremism, violence and dissent;
inviting demonstrations, sit-ins and illegal strikes; pornography, looseness,
and lack of morality; educating methods of making explosives and assault, chaos
and riot tactics; calling for normalizing relations with enemies and
circumventing the state's strategy in this regard; fishing for honest mistakes,
hunting flesh; taking statements out of context; and spreading hoaxes and
claims of miracles.”

The document specifically asks that the surveillance camera system have the ability to analyse and
monitor Twitter, Facebook and YouTube, but says that it would be a plus if the
provider could offer support on “more social networks (Instagram, LinkedIn,
Google, Viber, Whatsapp...).”

http://www.ipcctvcamera.net/blog/?p=400
http://www.ipcctvcamera.net/blog/?p=403
http://www.ipcctvcamera.net/blog/?p=410
http://www.ipcctvcamera.net/blog/?p=408
http://www.ipcctvcamera.net/blog/?p=414
http://souou.bloguez.com/souou/6011154/16ch-NVR-Recorder

began security systems a second investigation in July 2011

The global surveillance industry is estimated at $5 billion a year. The capabilities of surveillance technology have grown hugely in the past decade – in the hands of a repressive regime, this equipment eradicates free speech, quashes dissent and places dissidents at the mercy of ruling ip camera surveillance camera powers as effectively as guns and bombs, if not more so. However, export control regulations have not kept pace with this development, nor have companies taken it upon themselves to vet the governments to whom they sell their technology. The situation has now reached a crisis point: countries must enact strict export controls now, or be guilty of a staggering and continued hypocrisy with regard to global human rights. 

Today, surveillance technology ranges from malware which infects a target computer to record every keystroke, to systems for tapping undersea fibre-optic cables in order to monitor the communications of entire populations. In countries where detention without trial, torture and extra-judicial network camera 16ch NVR Recorder killings are commonplace, these technologies imperil the lives of every activist and dissident. 

In 1995, PI published a report on the international trade in surveillance technology, focusing on the sale of technologies by companies in Western countries to repressive regimes intent on using them as tools of political control. Since then, thanks to the enormous profits involved and the wholesale failure of governments and regulators to intervene, this unethical (and in some cases unlawful) practice has only escalated. We therefore begansecurity systems a second investigation in July 2011, and we are now using a blend of research and investigation, public campaigning, political engagement and strategic litigation to bring to light the abuses of the surveillance industry and ensure that it is properly regulated in future. 

Our objectives are: 

To raise worldwide awareness of the dangers of surveillance technologies and the ethical failures of the surveillance industry. 
To ensure that export controls are put in place in Europe and the US to restrict the sale of surveillance technologies to repressive regimes. 
To seek redress for those who have suffered harm as a result of Western-manufactured surveillance technologies. 
There is growing international momentum towards stricter regulation of surveillance technology exports. In the past year, the EU Parliament passed a resolution calling for stricter oversight of surveillance technology exports, President Obama announced an executive order to prevent such exports to Syria and Iran, and the French Secretary of State wireless ip camera surveillance system for the Digital Economy signalled a sea change in France’s export policies. The west must lead from the front, taking decisive action now to change export regulations, bringing its foreign and export policies in line, ending a staggering and damaging hypocrisy. 

Egyptian government for seeking out mass surveillance systems

Earlier this month, only a few days before the new president of Egypt was sworn in, leaked documents from the Ministry of Interior revealed that the government is trying to acquire mass ip camera wireless ip camera surveillance equipment capable of monitoring social networks such as Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube.

While being billed as a way to monitor social media in order to “monitor security hazards in social networks” and “identify persons representing a danger on society” (sic), past and recent actions by the Egyptian government demonstrate that democracy activists, political dissidents, and journalists are likely to be targeted. Just this week, prominent democracy activist and writer Alaa Abd El Fattah was sentenced to 15 years on trumped up charges for “illegal protesting and attacking a police officer.” Fattah, who has been jailed repeatedly for his activism, was arrested outside a Cairo courtroom after being prevented from attending his own trial and sentenced in absentia.

Given the crackdown that has occurred under ex-army chief and now President Abdul Fattah al-Sisi, it is frightening 4ch NVR System that the government will possess a surveillance system with the ability to monitor individuals, groups and organisations on social media around the clock. While the White House hasasked Sisi to carry out human rights reforms, U.S. and European governments must also cease the export of the Western-built tools that enable human right violations in Egypt.

The Social Networks Security Hazard Monitoring System

The copy of a call for tenders, leaked to the government-tied media outlet El Watan, asked for surveillance companies to submit plans for building an open source intelligence system called the “Social Networks Security Hazard Monitoring system”. The purpose of this system is to “conduct wide searches on various networks to find everything that is a violation of the law, the spreading of destructive ideas that help spreading chaos, tensions and corruption in society.”

In the document, the Ministry of Interior surveillance camera security systems lays out what these “destructive ideas” are:

…blasphemy and skepticism in religions; regional, religious, racial, and class divisions; spreading of rumors and intentional twisting of facts; throwing accusations; libel; sarcasm; using inappropriate words; calling for the departure of societal pillars; encouraging extremism, violence and dissent; inviting demonstrations, sit-ins and illegal strikes; pornography, looseness,  and lack of morality; educating methods of making explosives and assault, chaos and riot tactics; calling for normalizing relations with enemies and circumventing the state's strategy in this regard; fishing for honest mistakes, hunting flesh; taking statements out of context; and spreading hoaxes and claims of miracles.”

The document specifically asks that the system have the ability to analyse and monitor Twitter, Facebook and YouTube, but says that it would be a plus if the provider could offer support on “more social networks (Instagram, LinkedIn, Google, Viber, Whatsapp...).”

Turning social media in intelligence resource

The proposal details the government’s plan to implement a broad and systematic approach to open source intelligence gathering, turning social media in Egypt into an intelligence resource for the authorities. The government’s tender document shows that it is seeking to:

• identify what the current and past “hot topics” are for the region and who is accessing content related to these topics;
• identify who the influential actors are in every region and how do they interact with others;
• analyse opinions and trends inside social networks;
• assess the evolution of a person’s  network camera surveillance system  opinions by looking at current and old posts and their development through time; and
• search for “keywords that constitute a violation of the law and public moral, or that do not fit into norms and societal ties”

The government is also seeking to allow analysts to create an “unlimited number” of user accounts to interact with social media users, which would allow them to actively infiltrate and interfere with groups. According the to document, this is so authorities can be “able to communicate and interact with aware and zealot young people to monitor destructive ideas spreading on social networks, and consider how to refute and confront them.”

Complicit in the crackdown?

The Egyptian government is specifying that the “system is required to have been tested in other European or American countries, and to have taken part in international security trade shows”, raising once again the issue of surveillance technology exports from Western countries to the Global South.

According to information obtained by Reuters, seven unnamed foreign companies have submitted bids for the project. While the companies identities are currently unknown, Privacy International’sSurveillance Industry Index features documentations from several companies, all from Western countries, offering the exact or similar services outlined in the tender documents.

This is why for some time we have been advocating for the need for export controls to be placed on the very systems Egypt is now trying to acquire, due to the fact that they enable human rights abuse. If controls were in place, surveillance technologies would not flow into Egypt.

For various geopolitical reasons, the US and European countries have a record of taking a soft stance toward Egypt when it comes to successive governments’ poor human rights record. Sometimes the U.S. and European governments use stronger language regarding abuses but neglect to followup.

After the recent elections, the White House released a statement saying that they were looking forward to working with the new Egyptian president, though they “share concerns raised by observation16ch NVR Recorder groups about the restrictive political environment in which this election took placeafter the recent elections”. It continued: 

We have consistently expressed our concerns about limits on freedom of peaceful assembly, association, and expression and call upon the government to ensure these freedoms as well as due process rights for all Egyptians.  …  While elections are an integral component of a democratic society, true democracy is built on a foundation of rule of law, civil liberties, and open political discourse.  We urge the President-elect and the government to adopt the reforms that are needed to govern with accountability and transparency, ensure justice for every individual, and demonstrate a commitment to the protection of the universal rights of all Egyptians."

The lack of specific mention of surveillance is worrying, particularly now that we have insight into the new government’s ambitions. Nonetheless, while the White House acknowledges the importance of freedom of association, open political discourse, and the rule of law, these are all threatened by the surveillance technologies made in Western countries and exported with the governments’ knowledge.

Surveillance systems like these pose a serious threat to those like Alaa who are struggling to turn Egypt into a more free 16channel DVR/HVR and open society. While we condemn the Egyptian government for seeking out  4channel DVR/HVR mass surveillance systems, the West should not be complicit in the tracking and targeting of the Egyptian people.

Benefits of parking lots surveillance system

Parking lots and parking garages are appealing for criminals because they provide a source for a wide variety of criminal activities. Parking lot security 4ch NVR System can be a difficult problem for offices, retails, apartment property owners to handle. A large percentage of problems and liabilities usually occur in the parking lots; yet, illegal activities there are hard to monitor and control. Property damage or assaults, particularly sexual assaults involving females as the victims, will have a very serious affect on tenant relations.

With the constant influx of vehicles coming in and out of parking lots, keeping tabs on each vehicle is imperative to nurturing a safe environment for everyone, especially in poorly lit parking lots that are susceptible to criminal activity. Implementing a reliable surveillance system within the confines of a parking lot greatly enhances security and safety.

An unsafe parking lot can also be a dangerous place for your customers and employees. People with bad intentions have a lot of opportunities surveillance camera security systems to hide and prey on unsuspecting victims in parking lots; countless muggings, kidnappings, murders and rapes have occurred in unsafe parking lots and parking garages.

Benefits of parking lots surveillance system:

Prevent Vehicle Theft:  Many thieves see parking lots as potential gold mines, miles and miles of cars or personal property that they can rob. Visible security cameras can help deter thieves from breaking into cars on your lot, and can help aid law enforcement in identifying criminals who do rob cars on your lot. ip camera wireless ip camera Cameras can also help prevent theft of store property ie shopping carts, outdoor displays, tables and chairs, landscaping, etc.

Increase Public Safety: Customers are undoubtedly the most essential aspect of businesses. Keeping your customers happy and giving them a sense of safety and peace of mind when they’re shopping at your business establishes a sense of trust and loyalty.

Reduce Liability:  It’s inevitable that an accident will happen in your parking lot. Whether it’s a car crash, factors that dent may happen or a slip video surveillance 16ch NVR Recorder is an easy way to avoid costly liability claims, and even suits.

Identify Unpaid/Prohibited Vehicles:  Similar to a “dine-and-dash” in restaurants, drivers can attempt to leave the parking lot without paying. While most parking lots are monitored by attendants, it’s virtually impossible to ensure that every area of the lot is fully covered by staff. Surveillance cameras network camera surveillance system have the power to capture license plate numbers, allowing you to decide if you want to press charges or prohibit that customer from utilizing your parking lot in the future.

http://www.ipcctvcamera.net/blog/?page_id=66

http://www.ipcctvcamera.net/blog/?page_id=150

http://www.ipcctvcamera.net/blog/?page_id=91

http://www.ipcctvcamera.net/blog/?p=392

http://www.ipcctvcamera.net/blog/?p=384